So I’m alive. I felt a little bit better for a couple days, but now I’m back to feeling awful again. My throat hurts like crazy and it’s preventing me from sleeping and eating. Tomorrow I’m going to try to go see a doctor. All things considered, I guess I should be happy I got really sick in Sweden, and not like, Croatia.
There was a decent article in the New York Times a couple days ago about Ubuntu.
It’s always nice to see Linux getting attention in the mainstream press, although as usual, the author doesn’t really seem to grock free software. The article is in the business section, and the author seems to have a lot of trouble with the idea that software can be something other than a product, that software development can be something other than a business. So we get quotes like the following:
“CANONICAL’S model makes turning a profit difficult.”
“All told, Canonical’s annual revenue is creeping toward $30 million, Mr. Shuttleworth said.
That figure won’t worry Microsoft.”
“Canonical’s business model seems more like charity than the next great business story.”
Also, the NYT writer completely fails to draw attention to the distinction between “free as in beer” and “free as in freedom”. I realize that the average user probably only cares about the former, but it’s the latter that really makes free software a socially significant phenomenon. It’s the difference between software that obeys its user (you) and software that obeys some company that wrote it.